JEWISHNESS DOES NOT FOLLOW THE MOTHER

Let us discuss why you think Judaism follows the mother, because I totally disagree.

I'M GOING TO BE A MOTHER SOON

First, you cannot become a Jew. And, because Judah’s daughter in law, Tamar, was not a Jewesses, but was descended from Noah’s devious, illegitimate son Ham, who was no more Noah’s son than Ishmale was Abraham’s son, nor Cain Adam’s son, (refer my blog “Ishmael was not Abraham’s son”) yet her descendants are the Jews. Therefore, my claim is, that it is the descendants of the male, Judah in this case, not the mother who denotes Judaism. Only descendants of the Patriarch Judah are Jews.

As a matter of interest, while moral values, i.e., religion, is mostly inherited from the father, the mother’s input is mostly aesthetic. Therefore, as Tamar, the foremother of the Jews was a Canaanite, she would have introduced the black gene into the Jewish descendants of Shem. However, unless one or more of Jesus’ forefathers also married a Canaanite, i.e., an Arab female, most likely the black gene would have been bread out by the time the Rod was chosen from the descendants of King Jesse. So, Jesus would most likely have been a blue-eyed white Man. On the other hand, Japheth’s wife, being a direct descendant of Seth, would have been pure white, so their descendants would also have been 100% white too, at least until later years when Canaanite women entered in to the mix through Turkey and Morocco.

Further evidence for my claim that the mother does not confer Jewishness 

Women have been captured and married by both Jews and Arabs for millennia and both they, and their children, became whatever community they were brought up in, but if a man was taken in battle, then he was either killed or enslaved. Judah did not take a wife from Abraham and Sarai, yet it is his descendants that are the Jews. Therefore, although in most cases, such as Gen 27:46, the forefathers of Jesus married Jewesses to make sure that The Rod coming forth out of the stump of Jesse in Isa 11:1a, was an unblemished Lamb, we don’t even know where His ancestral mother, the wife of King David came from or if she was a Jewess or an Arab. However, I think we can still say that Jesus was a Jew of unequalled fidelity, even if we have to rely on the fictitious genealogy of Jesus in Mathew and Luke, neither of which mention the name of a single female, which is pretty much the same for the whole of the Old Testament. On the other hand, the Branch growing out of the Rod in Isa 11:1b, i.e., one of many descendants of Jesus in Isa 53:10, did not have to be perfect, and was only chosen for His average righteousness, attainable by all. So, for the 2000 years before a suitable Branch was chosen on the grounding of satan's host, Hitler, it was only necessary that the father was a direct descendant of Jesus, and it is He now, who will call the world to judgement and the Jews from the four corners of the earth.

JC2