top of page
Search

Adam Didn't do it

  • Writer: Gerald Calvert
    Gerald Calvert
  • Jan 12
  • 4 min read

Updated: 6 days ago

I would like to give you my understanding of Adam’s involvement in the ‘Fall’. Please do not be offended if it differs from the current understanding.

Beginning with Genesis 2:7. And the LORD G’d formed man [of] the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. Humans were only created to carry Man’s spirit around the Creation. As both the Creator and the destroyer are only Spirits, i.e., the Elohim, it was only man’s spirit that was created in the image of G’d’s.

Gen 2:10 And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads. I first need to show you in Gen 1:2 that ‘firmament[GC1] ’ does not mean the atmosphere; it means an expanse of something and in the case of Gen 1:2, it means an expanse of hard surface, which Moses prematurely called Heaven. Note the uppercase ‘H’ of this Heaven in every bible, as opposed to the lowercase heaven in Gen 1:15. And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. I say prematurely, because Heaven was still covered with the water of the oceans that G’d used to create the firmament.  

Having established that the whole of Pangaea is the only Heaven there is, and ever will be, after it is restored, I believe that the whole of the earth’s surface is also ‘The Garden of Eden’. Now, if all of Pangaea is the ‘Garden of Eden’ then the river referred to here, is not a river at all; it, and its tributaries are the canals that separate the tectonic plates or continents of Pangaea. Visual evidence of this is available in my book ‘The Papacy Can Now End’ in the chapter ‘Seven days of Creation’.

Let me now question the generally accepted belief that a tree[GC2]  can really represent the message G’d is conveying here. Gen 2:17. But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. Why did G’d give this message exclusively to Adam? Quite simply, G’d made Man the head of the household. All messages from G’d came through the male[GC3] . Women were to defer to their husband in all matters outside the home, especially in matters of well-being of the family and instructions from G’d.

Genesis 3:1 Now the serpent, (an allegory for the first host [GC4] of satan) was more subtle than any beast [GC5] of the field which the LORD God had made. Because the serpant was not a beast, it was a man. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? I am reasonably confident that the next 5 verses are pretty much as they occurred. So, unless Adam failed to convey G’d’s instruction to Eve not to listen to the voice in her head tempting her to disobey G’d’s command, then I’m sorry, but I believe Eve simply disobeyed her husband, followed by each blaming the other. Gen 3:13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What [is] this [that] thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat[GC6] . Note, that at no stage was G’d visible as a human being, because, as I said earlier, He is merely a Spirit. The Father Spirit.

Anyway, that is what I think.

Gerald Calvert for “The Papacy Can Now End”

 

[GC1] Firmament. In the mid-13th century, ‘firmament’, from the Latin firmamentum, or firmus ‘firm’ literally means a support or strengthening. See adjective ‘firm’ used in Vulgate to translate Greek stereoma, meaning ‘a firm or solid structure’ and which, in the Old Testament, translated the Hebrew raqia, a word used for both ‘the vault of the sky’ or ‘the floor of the earth’. Literally, it means ‘expanse’ from raqa—‘to spread out’, but in Syriac, it means ‘to make firm or solid’.

 [GC2]Gen 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil. This surely represents temptation by the serpent, i.e., an allegory for the first host of satan, as Adam was the first host of G’d.

 [GC3]Call me a misogynist if you wish, but I didn’t make the rules. However, following the fulfilment of John 16:11  in 1945, G’d can now communicate with all people; black, white or brindle, male or female.

 [GC4]Host. Adam was the first host of God while the serpent was an allegory for the first host of satan who was black. It has been through the senses of the descendants of their host that both God and satan have experienced the Creation. If satan was unaware of something, he could not destroy it. Consequently, on the death of hitler, satan’s last host, who never produced a replacement son, he was no longer able to experience the Creation, and so could no longer destroy anything. G’d’s purpose in separating the two righteous sons of Noah, Japheth from Shem, in Babylon, sending Japheth north of the Mediterranean Sea, quickly forgotten by satan, at least until ships became seaworthy enough to cross it, thus alerting satan of the existence of these millions of people also claiming to be G’d’s people.

 [GC5]The serpent was only an allegory for the human host of satan, and as such, was more cunning than beasts, i.e., animals

 [GC6]There was nothing to eat here. Eve was mentally seduced and eventually gave birth to Cain, the half white and half black next host of satan. As this had nothing to do with eating, it was Eve alone succumbing to temptation. Therefore, she could not have given to Adam to eat either.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page